The media would love for the narrative to run towards Obama's camp hitting clinton on non-policy issues such as scandals from Bill Clinton's era.

Obviously Plouffe and the Obama camp are too smart to fall for that obvious trap, and have stated they won't go there.  But I think they should, in tone at least, be taking this even further...

With the popular vote becoming one of two key benchmarks for superdelegate "high ground," as this race gets closer and closer, I noticed that the popular vote count has been unable to include caucus states:

I'm not a big fan of the silly plagiarism debate, and all I've done here is grab what's probablyt the tip of the iceberg in terms of what's already making the rounds on youtube.

... but on the other hand, since the press seems to love the visual comparisons, perhaps they should take a look at some of these little lifts from obama to clinton's mouth :)

----

Fired up, yes we can, and other riffs from an obama supporter video:

http://www.youtube.com/...

Hilarious "yes we will" refrain from hillary (along with other words very closely paraphrased from obama.

http://www.youtube.com/...

With both the Obama and Hillary campaigns acknowledging that Obama did in fact win more delegates on Super Tuesday, I can't understand why CNN continues to print incorrect news and "analysis" of the results.

This isn't a case of misquoting due to superdelegates -- in many cases specifically referring to earned delegates, Clinton is being cited as gaining more from Super Tuesday.

With this continuing into a second news cycle, it's time the Obama fans gave some serious volume of feedback to cnn to keep them from making this incorrect claim:

CNN still has it wrong:
http://www.cnn.com/...

Contact CNN!

http://www.cnn.com/...

Updated -- took off NYT, which I now understand had the appropriate caveat.